Practice Health Check
Score eight signals across revenue cycle, payer mix, referral concentration, authorization performance and infusion economics.
Illustrative assumptions. Default values here are example inputs for demonstration only — not validated reimbursement rates, costs or benchmarks. Replace every field with your own practice’s figures.
Scoring bands in this prototype are illustrative reference points chosen to demonstrate the mechanism — they are not licensed benchmark data. A production version would score against validated, sourced benchmarks appropriate to infectious disease practices of your size and payer mix, with the methodology published.
Practice health score
Under pressure
A weighted read across 8 signals in 5 categories. The score is a prompt to look somewhere specific — not a grade.
By category
Days in A/R 67.5 days · Denial rate by dollars 11% · Net collection rate 91% · A/R over 90 days 26%
Largest single payer share 47.5%
Largest referral source share 42.5%
Median referral to first dose 7 days
Infusion contribution margin 17.5%
Start here
A/R over 90 days · Revenue cycle
Segment by payer and by drug — concentration in one agent usually means a criteria or coding problem.
Read the ID revenue-cycle guidance- Weighted score
- 50 / 100
- Band
- Under pressure
- Signals below adequate
- 8 of 8
- Strongest category
- Revenue cycle
Nothing you enter here is transmitted or stored. The calculation runs entirely in your browser.
How this is calculated
- Each of eight signals is scored 0–100 by linear interpolation between a 'strong' and a 'weak' reference point.
- Signals are grouped into categories — revenue cycle, payer mix, capacity, staffing, and for ID referral concentration, authorization performance and infusion economics — and each category is scored on its own.
- Categories are weighted and combined into a single practice score; net collection rate and denial rate carry the most weight.
- The 'start here' recommendation is the signal with the lowest weight-adjusted score, not the lowest raw score.
What it does not do
- The reference points are illustrative demonstration values, not licensed benchmarks. A production version would score against validated, sourced data with published methodology.
- It cannot distinguish a definitional difference (gross vs net days in A/R) from a real performance difference.
- A score is a prompt to look somewhere specific. It is not a grade, and it is not a diagnosis.
Now that you have a number
Want to understand what's driving your score?
A score tells you where to look. Persistex helps independent infectious disease practices identify revenue-cycle opportunities and the operational inefficiencies behind them — working from your real data rather than from estimates.
Prototype: these routes to a demonstration form. No data is transmitted or stored.
Other tools
Can Independent ID Work? Scenario Model
Test the levers side by side — adding an APP, opening infusion, changing hospital volume, shifting payer mix, adding a provider.
CalculatorIndependent ID Practice Economics Calculator
The whole practice in one model: office, hospital, APP and infusion revenue against staffing, drug and overhead cost.
CalculatorInfusion & OPAT Economics Calculator
Drug acquisition, nursing, chair time, supplies and reimbursement across a full course of therapy — by site of care.
DirectoryPayer & Drug Authorization Lookup
A curated route to the authoritative sources: ASP pricing files, HCPCS/J-code updates, coverage determinations, home infusion policy and appeals.