Skip to content
CalculatorInteractive prototype

Independent ID Practice Economics Calculator

The whole practice in one model: office, hospital, APP and infusion revenue against staffing, drug and overhead cost.

Illustrative assumptions. Default values here are example inputs for demonstration only — not validated reimbursement rates, costs or benchmarks. Replace every field with your own practice’s figures.

Providers
FTE
FTE
Hospital consultation
/wk
$

Blended new and follow-up, net of expected collection. Use your own realisation, not a fee schedule figure.

Outpatient clinic
/wk
$
/wk

Scope, supervision and billing arrangement are set by state law and payer policy — verify before modelling.

$
Contracted institutional services
$

Stewardship leadership, infection prevention, medical directorship and coverage agreements. If this is zero and you are still providing the work, that is the finding.

Infusion & OPAT
/mo
$

Net of drug acquisition, nursing and coordination. Model it first in the Infusion & OPAT Economics calculator.

Cost
$

Compensation, benefits, malpractice and payroll taxes.

$
$

Nursing, pharmacy support, coordination, authorisation and administration.

$

Space, systems, insurance, professional fees, debt service.

Monthly contribution

$13,180

$158,160 annualised · $4,393 per physician per month before partner distribution.

Revenue by stream

Hospital consultation$36,400
Outpatient clinic$38,480
Contracted services$12,000
Infusion & OPAT$53,300
Total cost−$127,000
Contribution$13,180
Total monthly revenue
$140,180
Provider cost3 physicians + 1 APPs
$77,000
Staff and overhead
$50,000
Monthly contribution
$13,180
Annualised
$158,160
Clinical share of revenueConsultation and clinic
53%
Contracted + ancillary shareThe streams a wRVU model cannot see
47%
Break-even consult volumeYou are running 48 per week
31 / wk

Contracted services and infusion carry a substantial share of revenue. That is the structure most independent ID practices need — and it means payer and drug policy risk deserves its own line in your risk register.

This is a contribution model, not a P&L. It excludes tax, partner distribution, working capital tied up in drug inventory, and the timing gap between administering therapy and being paid for it.

How this is calculated

  • Revenue is built from four independent streams: hospital consultation, outpatient clinic (physician and APP), contracted institutional services, and infusion contribution.
  • Weekly volumes are annualised at 4.33 weeks per month.
  • Cost is provider compensation (physicians and APPs at their own rates) plus support staff and overhead.
  • Break-even consult volume solves for the consults needed to cover whatever the other three streams do not.

What it does not do

  • It is a contribution model, not a P&L: no tax, no partner distribution, no depreciation.
  • It ignores working capital — in buy-and-bill you pay for drug inventory well before you are paid for it, and that timing gap is real.
  • It assumes infusion contribution per unit is already net of drug and nursing cost. Model that separately first.

Now that you have a number

Want to pressure-test this against your actual claims data?

This model is only as good as the assumptions you put into it. Persistex works with independent infectious disease practices on billing, coding and revenue cycle, and a practice review starts from your actual payment and denial data.

Prototype: these routes to a demonstration form. No data is transmitted or stored.